Google

Wednesday, September 14, 2005

 
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”


Where in that, the Constitutions only mention of religion, does it become unconstitutional to say God in public? Did I miss a meeting? Are judges no longer bound by the Constitution? Or is it just an annoyance they have to get around? How is saying the Pledge of Allegiance, with its mention of God the Congress establishing religion?

Gods Enemy on Earth Michael Newdow has another option he could consider to continue his crusade against the rest of us. He could try push get the California State Legislature or the US Congress to pursue this. There is of course one problem with that. That plan of attack requires some support from the general public and as public outcry has shown, there is NO support for it except from Judges who ignore the Constitution apparently. I say every judges oath they have to swear upon ascending to the bench be changed to having to read out loud the entire Constitution and Bill of Rights.

Comments:
Liberalism is a mental disease that results in an inability to think. How does the "establishment of religion clause" give anyone the right to abolish freedom of speech? These people are psychotic.
 
Post a Comment

 

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?